|
Client: ICS/Penetron International Ltd. c/o All Island
Testing Laboratories
Project: Information of
Client
Subject: Laboratory Testing of Penetron
Waterproofing Material
Report No. 94-6175 Date
12/21/94
We present herewith laboratory test results of the
Penetron coated concrete samples. The Penetron waterproofing
material was supplied by the client in sealed
bags.
1. CONCRETE MIX
The concrete
mix design used in this study consisted of the following
ingredients:
- MATERIALS
|
- ASTM NO.
|
- lbs./cu. yard
|
- Portland Cement - Type I
|
- C-150
|
- 517
|
- (*) Sand
|
- C-33
|
- 1465
|
- (*) Coarse Aggregate, Size #57
|
- C-33
|
- 1800
|
- Water, Gallons
|
- ---
|
- 31.4
|
- Admixtures, oz.
- -Air - mix
- -Water Reducer
|
- C-494
- C-494
|
- 3.9
- 12.9
|
- Slump, Inch
|
- ---
|
- 4.0
|
- Air, %
|
- ---
|
- 5.0
|
* Saturated Surface Dry Basis
The concrete mixed used is a regular placement
mix with an f ' c = 3000 psi
strength.
EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP
By
using the concrete mix, eight 4 x 8 inch cylinders were
prepared.
At the age of 24 hours, the top surface of
six of the cylinders were coated with the Penetron
waterproofing material.
The Penetron powder was mixed
with water at the rate of:
Three Penetron by volume
One water by volume
The slurry thus formed was brushed onto the top surface of
the concrete cylinders at the rate of 2 1/2 lbs. per square
yard.
After the treatment, all concrete cylinders were
placed into a curing room at 730 F. and 100% relative humidity
for two weeks.
At the end of the two weeks, the
cylinders were subjected to tests.
TESTS
PERFORMED
The tests performed consisted of the
following:
Compressive Strength - ASTM C39
Microscopic Examinations - ASTM C457
Chloride Content - AASHTO - T260
Chemical Analysis (Infrared Spectroscopy) Perkin Elmer
Method: 990-9647
Water Permeability - Handbook of Concrete Engineering,
1974,
Edited by Mark Finkel Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
A. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
The Penetron
treated and the untreated (control) cylinders were treated for
compressive strength with the following results:
| Cylinder I.D |
14 days old |
28 days old |
| Penetron Treated |
3540 |
4150 |
| Control (Untreated) |
3350 |
3915 |
B. MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATIONS
- Both the Penetron treated and untreated concrete samples
were studied under magnification to determine the depth of
penetration of the waterproofing compound into the concrete
surface.
-
- Microscopic examination revealed that some components of
the penetration diffusion into the concrete was as follows:
-
| Depth from Concrete
Surface, mm |
Depth
Penetrated |
| 0-5 |
Considerable |
| 5-10 |
Moderate |
| 10-25 |
Some |
| 25-50 |
Little |
| 50+ |
Negligible |
(*) These penetrations or diffusions reflect
the observations made at the age of 14 days of the
Penetron treatment. As the system
ages, more diffusions of Penetron compo nents
are
expected.
C. ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE FOR PENETRON
CONTENT
Several depths of the Penetron treated
concrete samples were tested by Infrared Spectroscopy Methods.
The test results revealed the following:
According to
the Infrared Spectra attached. the amount of Penetron
components at I/ 2 inch depth from the treated surface was
considerable.
The spectrum of the untreated or control
concrete sample had considerable less calcium, silica, and
their components and reaction products than the treated
concrete spectrums of the depths studied.
D.
CHLORIDE CONTENT
Both the Penetron waterproofing
material and the concrete were tested for water
soluble
chloride contents. The test results were as follows:
| Sample I.D. |
Chloride (CI2_) Content
mg/kg |
| Concrete |
42 |
| Penetron |
40 |
E. WATER PERMEABILITY TESTS
Both
the Penetron coated concrete and the uncoated (control) sample
of the concrete
were subjected to water permeability
tests. The test results showed the following:
| SAMPLE I.D. |
WATER PERMEABILITY, K |
| Control (Untreated) Concrete |
1.8 x 10-11 cm/sec |
| Penetron Treated Concrete (14 days
old) |
2.1 x 10-13 cm/sec |
| Penetron Treated Concrete (28 days
old) |
21.9 x 10-14
cm/sec |
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these test results, the following
conclusions were drawn:
The compressive strength of the
Penetron treated concrete cylinders were slightly higher than
the untreated cylinders. This increase corresponds to
approximately 6% gain over the untreated concrete. However,
the primary benefit of Penetron is waterproofing concrete
surface rather than increasing the compressive
strength.
The depth of diffusion of the Penetron
components into the concrete was found to be as
follows:
| 0-5: |
|
Considerable |
| 5-10: |
|
Moderate |
| 10-25: |
|
Some |
| 25-50: |
|
Little |
| 50+: |
|
Negligible |
|
It should be noted that these penetrations were
accomplished in 14 days of age. As the concrete ages, more and
probably deeper diffusions of the waterproofing material may
take place.
Microscopic examinations revealed that the Penetron
components that diffused into the concrete surface resulted in
a crystalline growth, white in color. These crystalline
growths appeared to be hydration products of the Penetron
components with cement's calcium- silicate gel in the matrix
of the concrete.
The water permeability of Penetron treated concrete was
considerably slower that the water permeability of the
untreated concrete. This indicates that Penetron treatment
improves the water proofing properties of the concrete
considerably.
The water soluable chloride content of
the Penetron was very low and about equal to that of the
concrete. Thest test results indicate that beneficial effects
of Penetron are not related to chlorides.

|