
Client: ICS/Penetron International
Ltd. c/o All Island Testing Laboratories Project: Information of
Client Subject: Laboratory Testing of Penetron Waterproofing
Material Report No. 94-6175 Date 12/21/94
We present herewith laboratory test
results of the Penetron coated concrete samples. The Penetron waterproofing
material was supplied by the client in sealed bags.
1. CONCRETE
MIX The concrete mix design used in this study consisted of the
following ingredients:
- MATERIALS
|
- ASTM NO.
|
- lbs./cu. yard
|
- Portland Cement - Type I
|
- C-150
|
- 517
|
- (*) Sand
|
- C-33
|
- 1465
|
- (*) Coarse Aggregate, Size #57
|
- C-33
|
- 1800
|
- Water, Gallons
|
- ---
|
- 31.4
|
- Admixtures, oz.
- -Air - mix
- -Water Reducer
|
- C-494
- C-494
|
- 3.9
- 12.9
|
- Slump, Inch
|
- ---
|
- 4.0
|
- Air, %
|
- ---
|
- 5.0
|
* Saturated Surface Dry Basis
The concrete mixed used is a
regular placement mix with an f ' c = 3000 psi
strength.
EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP
By using the concrete
mix, eight 4 x 8 inch cylinders were prepared.
At the age of 24 hours,
the top surface of six of the cylinders were coated with the Penetron
waterproofing material.
The Penetron powder was mixed with water at the
rate of:
Three Penetron by volume
One water by volume
The slurry thus formed was brushed onto
the top surface of the concrete cylinders at the rate of 2 1/2 lbs. per square
yard.
After the treatment, all concrete cylinders were placed into a
curing room at 730 F. and 100% relative humidity for two weeks.
At the
end of the two weeks, the cylinders were subjected to tests.
TESTS
PERFORMED
The tests performed consisted of the following:
Compressive Strength - ASTM
C39
Microscopic Examinations - ASTM
C457
Chloride Content - AASHTO -
T260
Chemical Analysis (Infrared
Spectroscopy) Perkin Elmer Method: 990-9647
Water Permeability - Handbook of
Concrete Engineering, 1974,
Edited by Mark Finkel Van Nostrand
Reinhold Co.
A. COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
The Penetron treated and the untreated (control)
cylinders were treated for compressive strength with the following results:
| Cylinder
I.D |
14 days
old |
28 days
old |
| Penetron
Treated |
3540 |
4150 |
| Control
(Untreated) |
3350 |
3915 |
B. MICROSCOPIC
EXAMINATIONS
- Both the Penetron treated and
untreated concrete samples were studied under magnification to determine the
depth of penetration of the waterproofing compound into the concrete surface.
-
- Microscopic examination revealed that
some components of the penetration diffusion into the concrete was as follows:
-
| Depth from
Concrete Surface, mm |
Depth
Penetrated |
|
0-5 |
Considerable |
|
5-10 |
Moderate |
|
10-25 |
Some |
|
25-50 |
Little |
|
50+ |
Negligible |
(*) These penetrations or
diffusions reflect the observations made at the age of 14 days of the
Penetron treatment. As the system ages, more diffusions
of Penetron compo nents are
expected.
C. ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE FOR PENETRON
CONTENT
Several depths of the Penetron treated concrete samples
were tested by Infrared Spectroscopy Methods. The test results revealed the
following:
According to the Infrared Spectra attached. the amount of
Penetron components at I/ 2 inch depth from the treated surface was
considerable.
The spectrum of the untreated or control concrete sample
had considerable less calcium, silica, and their components and reaction
products than the treated concrete spectrums of the depths studied.
D.
CHLORIDE CONTENT Both the Penetron waterproofing material and the
concrete were tested for water soluble chloride contents. The test results
were as follows:
| Sample
I.D. |
Chloride (CI2_)
Content mg/kg |
| Concrete |
42 |
| Penetron |
40 |
E. WATER PERMEABILITY
TESTS Both the Penetron coated concrete and the uncoated (control)
sample of the concrete were subjected to water permeability tests. The test
results showed the following:
|
SAMPLE I.D. |
WATER PERMEABILITY,
K |
| Control (Untreated)
Concrete |
1.8 x 10-11
cm/sec |
| Penetron Treated Concrete
(14 days old) |
2.1 x 10-13
cm/sec |
| Penetron Treated Concrete
(28 days old) |
21.9 x 10-14
cm/sec |
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these test results,
the following conclusions were drawn:
The compressive strength of the
Penetron treated concrete cylinders were slightly higher than the untreated
cylinders. This increase corresponds to approximately 6% gain over the untreated
concrete. However, the primary benefit of Penetron is waterproofing concrete
surface rather than increasing the compressive strength.
The depth of
diffusion of the Penetron components into the concrete was found to be as
follows:
|
0-5: |
|
Considerable |
|
5-10: |
|
Moderate |
|
10-25: |
|
Some |
|
25-50: |
|
Little |
|
50+: |
|
Negligible |
|
It should be noted that these
penetrations were accomplished in 14 days of age. As the concrete ages, more and
probably deeper diffusions of the waterproofing material may take
place.
Microscopic examinations revealed
that the Penetron components that diffused into the concrete surface resulted in
a crystalline growth, white in color. These crystalline growths appeared to be
hydration products of the Penetron components with cement's calcium- silicate
gel in the matrix of the concrete.
The water permeability of Penetron
treated concrete was considerably slower that the water permeability of the
untreated concrete. This indicates that Penetron treatment improves the water
proofing properties of the concrete considerably.
The water soluable
chloride content of the Penetron was very low and about equal to that of the
concrete. Thest test results indicate that beneficial effects of Penetron are
not related to chlorides.

|